Major Problems In California History Essay

The major arguments in the two essays by Cletus E. Daniel and Devra Anne Weber go around around the harsh working conditions and misfortunate pay that the advance workers were subjected to in California. These injustices prompted reactions from the farm workers through strikes that were organized by their unions and mutual aid societies in a bid to negotiate for better wages and improved standards of living. The essays withal highlight the fact that the farm workforce in California comprised majorly of Mexican workers and a minority of Filipino workers.Finally, the essays highlight the unsuccessful nature of the attempts by the farm workers to push for reforms in their working and living standards as wellhead as negotiating for wage increase. However, there also exist some differences surrounded by the conclusions of the two essays. According to Devra, the Mexican union headed by the Mexican Consul, Terrazas was fitting to reach an correspondence with the growers concerning the conditions and wages of the Mexican workers. The agreement included a wage payment of between twenty quin to thirty five cents per hour and thirteen cents a crate.It also suggested guaranteed access to water to workers provide by the growers. Devra also records that this agreement was reached without complete support of the union. According to her, the publish of communism was vital in the history of California effort. This comes to light with the agreement of the growers to give protection to their workers against the communist agitators (Weber, 295). Cletus however does not record any(prenominal) instance where such an agreement was reached between union members and growers.He concludes by showing the plight and helplessness suffered by the farm workers following the mischance to procure better working conditions and higher wages. Cletus distanced capitalism as the make out of the problems experienced by the farm workers citing that they believed their problems to be as a conduce of low wages (Daniel, 288). As far as the difference in the conclusions of the two essays is concerned, the question on the accuracy of the California history of labor party comes to mind. This is a problem that is brought about by the uniqueness of each originator in interpretation of events and occurrences in history.This in the two essays is brought to light by the link created by Devra between the problems the growers were experiencing with the farm workers and communist agitators while Cletus explores this write from a capitalist perspective and its link to the problems experienced by the farm workers. The Imperial Valley episode reveals a number of issues about labor and unionism in the US. To begin with, it highlights the frustrations of the farm workers in terms of poor working and living conditions as well as low wages which led to the surge in protests and strikes.It is these frustrations that necessitated the participation and formation of unions so as to f ight for the rights of the workers following the realization that the only way that they could be perceive was only if they acted collectively. Another issue that is revealed is the use of authorities to suppress the unionisation attempts of the workers as well as to deny them their rights of assembly and strikes. The growers used city, county, put forward and federal authorities to quell strikes by the workers.There also was the foul trial of the leaders of the unions for example the El Centro trial which were meant to intimidate coming(prenominal) leaders of the unions. Finally, it appears that it is the communists that were actively involved in the fight for the rights of the farm workers as well as the unionization attempts. This is because it is the communists that came to head the unions and organize strikes against the growers who were capitalists. References Daniel Cletus E. Communist Organizers in the Imperial Valley Weber Devra A. Mexicano Farm workers on Strike