.

Tuesday, April 30, 2019

Understanding the Nature of Groups and Teams Essay

Understanding the Nature of Groups and Teams - Essay ExampleIn intimately cases, individuals form groups, which later become a team. According to psychoanalytical object-relations theory (Sher, 2004), individuals, groups, and teams are not sovereign entities but rather are constructs that bond organizational expectations to human feelings and beliefs. Groups and teams rely on a ground substance style of management (Gilley & Kerno Jr., 2010), are influenced by the existing organizational authority, and participants show commitment because of the expectations demanded by their organizations. The bill between groups and teams is that while groups demand a lot of control, planning, and direction in its leadership, are guided by a series of well established goals and objectives, reward members depending on performance (Seat & Sundstrom, 2004), and used when executing detail functional tasks in an organization, teams demand collaborative relationships among members, are guided by a mi ssion in fulfilling their mandate (Offermann, 2006), and can exist in or outside an organization. Therefore, teams are groups with a higher figure in achieving goals because of creativity, mutual sharing of benefits, attributes, small member size mostly between 5-12 people, and a divided purpose.A group or team is always formed in handling different problems in an organization. Therefore, the management must be keen when determining which one to use for effective task performance and complimentary results. It is best to use groups in instances where tasks are easy, especially when results are expected within a specific timeframe in order to measure the expertise of each member on service delivery, and only(prenominal) if there is a well defined a guiding purpose. However, whenever the management deems there is complexity in task execution, which demands collaborative interactions, availability of enough and reliable resources, teams are given a priority (Gilley & Kerno Jr., 2010 ). In most occasions, organizations rely on teams

No comments:

Post a Comment